OPENING STATEMENT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
About a week ago, on the 13th of this month of
February, President Paul Biya of Cameroon celebrated his 82nd
birthday. It was not a national event but a family affair. Even so, it carried
some significance.
A POLITICAL DINOSAUR
Firstly, that anniversary was an indication that rightly or
wrongly, he had outlived the “three score and ten” years stated in the bible.
Interestingly, when the late American President Ronald Reagan hit a similar
age, he remarked that he was now “living on borrowed time”, which meant that
the added years were a bonus from God and not an attribution of his by any
right.
A close look at Biya leads one to the conclusion he is a contradiction in terms in the sense that
for someone his age, he still looks quite fit and although it is not
necessarily anyone`s wish, he could still carry on as President of the Republic
for another ten years, if he wishes. By all indications, he can still ride his
bicycle (a favourite sport of his), he can spend hours standing receiving
dignitaries and delivering speeches. He does not use a walking stick and does
not appear to have memory lapses.
AN OVERSTAYED WELCOME
Even so, the fact remains that he has ruled the country for “too
long”. He acceded to the presidency of the republic in 1982 when his
predecessor, Cameroon`s pioneer president, Ahmadou Ahidjo stepped down. That
means Biya has been in power for a record 32 years, in fact, 33, come May of
this year. That makes him one of the longest-serving presidents on the African
continent. He has by far outlived Ahidjo`s 24 years in power. Yet, in Ahidjo`s
days, Cameroon and the world were alarmed that a single president could have
been in power for so long, a little short of a quarter of a century.
BIYA`S GRAND CHILDREN
As might be expected, not every Cameroonian approves of
Biya`s extended rule over the nation, which lends credence to the argument that
familiarity breeds contempt. The truth is that people born at the time he
became president are now big grown-up adults with perhaps some of them becoming
grandparents. What is even more acute is the fact that Biya had the
constitution amended in order to remove the clause that limited the
presidential tenure.
ACTS OF DISAPPROVAL
Those who disapprove of his perpetuated stay in power have
made it known in many ways. Some have insulted him. In fact, Fru Ferdinand who
used to be Section President of the CPDM in the United Kingdom once described
Biya as “the most insulted president in the world”. Volumes of published
criticisms have been leveled at Biya nationally and internationally. Ni John Fru
Ndi, leader of Cameroon`s main opposition party, the SDF once described him as
“a thief who stole my victory” (an obvious reference to the 1992 presidential
election which Fru Ndi is widely believed to have won but in which the Supreme
Court declared Biya as the victor). Attempts have been made by Biya`s detractors
to have him tried in courts abroad for alleged corruption. Demonstrations have
been held to protest against his visits to foreign countries such as the United
States. Members of the Tekumbeng women`s
secret society who parade the streets stark naked when they are in action
appeared on the streets of Bamenda to “denounce and curse Biya”. Opposition demonstrations carried posters of
him with blood oozing from his mouth and visible on his hands to show that he
was a killer. Writers on social media have given him all kinds of names such
“Satan Biya”. All of that has happened. Yet he is still firmly in power.
BUT WHAT IS BIYA`S TRUMP CARD?
The question now is for how much longer? Well, normally until
the next presidential election in three years` time. But then again he could
surprise everyone and step down before that time. He could easily call early
elections and run or not run as a candidate.
If that were to happen, would his opponents be ready for the match?
Right now, despite Biya`s “sins”, he still has the backing of
foreign countries. None of the major countries of the West has withdrawn its
ambassador as a measure of protest. Instead, they are all stepping up aid and
assistance to Cameroon. A few years ago, when the new purpose-built American embassy
in Yaounde was being formally opened, the then American Ambassador said that
the fact that they had decided to build their own compound in Cameroon was a
sign that American had “come to stay.” It is interesting that quite close to
the embassy, is a home that Biya said to have been built by Biya for his
retirement.
THE CRUX OF THE MATTER
Inherently, the problem is not only Paul Biya. It is also us
Cameroonians. It is Cameroonians who despite his numerous shortcomings, have
failed to remove him from power. By so doing, the Cameroonian people have
robbed themselves of the opportunity of change. Yet change is refreshing and
brings about new ways of thinking and doing things.
AN UNCOORDINATED ATTACK
The opposition that
could have done it through the ballot box has failed because it contains too
many political parties, the reason being that each party leader wants to be the
next president of the Republic. The media has failed because media moguls do
not pay their employees well and thus drive them to unorthodox alternative methods
of earning a living. The media has also failed because media organs accept
grants from the very regime they are meant to put in the hot seat. Such a
relationship strongly compromises the independence and objectivity of the
media. The elite has failed because it has been using a counter-productive
weapon which is that of insults and
denigration directed at Paul Biya - and in some cases - the country, Cameroon. They do not seem to
realize that the anger they have fueled has not solved the problem.
THE MISSED OPPORTUNITIES
Yet there exist a considerable number of avenues these groups
could use to get Paul Biya out, if they were really strong. A typical example
is the time of crisis such as now when the entire nation stands threatened by
the Islamic sect, Boko Haram. This is a time when Cameroonians – regardless of
their political leanings – should have stood together in denouncing the
“enemy”. Perhaps some of them are hoping that through the weakening of the
state by the external attack, Paul Biya may be swept out. That may be so. But
what if that does not happen? Again they are missing a golden opportunity to
endear the Cameroonian people to themselves because no one likes to live in an
insecure country.
PICKING UP THE WRONG END OF THE STICK
Angry critics argue – and not without justification – that
after such a long period in office, Biya should go. There is even a “Biya Must
Go” campaign being waged on the internet. To substantiate the claim the
examples of other leaders who left “before it was too late” such as Pope
Benedict the 6th and Nelson Mandela are cited. Even so, the truth is
that not every leader is a Pope Benedict or a Nelson Mandela. Besides, the
counter argument is that there are other presidents who have refused to go and
have even died in power.
Another bone of contention is that of the issue of the
Southern Cameroons whose proponents basically contend that Anglophones were
tricked and have been subjected to the role of second class citizens. So far,
the movement has stopped short of becoming a political party, perhaps because
it feels that if it did so it would be playing into the hands of the enemy. One
of the fundamental flaws of the movement is that it is not only divided but
poorly organized. It seems to lack a clear-cut vision and most of the time,
when it states its case, it spends at least 75 per cent of the time analyzing
and re-analyzing the problem rather than looking at how to get out of it. One
of its hopes is that the UN will get up one day and declare that the Southern
Cameroons are “free and independent”. Strictly speaking, that is wishful
thinking because the UN is not in the business of breaking up “countries”.
However, when a territory fights its way to independence and freedom, then the
UN can recognize it. Some of the decisions of the movement are arbitrary, one
of which is the justification for the cut-off point they have chosen. Why go
back to the “distant’ days of the Southern Cameroons and not the more recent
times when there existed an Anglophone State of West Cameroon that enjoyed
equality with the Francophone State of East Cameroon? Anglophones who ran the
affairs of their state at the time proved that they could govern a country
well. In fact some of the national policies at the time have now been espoused
by the current Republic that includes both the Anglophone and the Francophone.
One of them is the shift from the typically Francophone two-shift system of
work to the typically Anglophone one-shift. Another question is why the cut-off
point has not been the highly productive period Cameroon as a whole spent under
German colonial rule. There was then no division between Anglophone and
Francophone. What`s more, the Germans left behind a considerable number of
development landmarks. So, why not yearn for that period?
Although the Southern Cameroons lobby group claims to be
championing the cause of the Anglophone, it is also a fact that on that very
issue, there are divisions among Anglophones. Otherwise, how can one explain
the fact that contrary to the above group that wants “separation’’, other
members of the Anglophone community have opted to work with the Francophone, examples
being the several Anglophone candidates who ran against Paul Biya at the 2011
presidential election, as well as Anglophone
members in the Senate and the National Assembly, to name those. So, frankly,
the Southern Cameroons adherents ought to rethink their position. Interestingly,
in all of this debate, one opinion leader, Mola Njoh Litumbe states that talk
about a “union” between the two peoples is unacceptable because according to
him, “there was never any such union”.
THE WAY FORWARD
There are a number of ways in which the desired change can be
made to happen. Nonetheless, the first step in that direction must consist of
those driving for change to admit that the methods they have used so far have
not worked. So they must pull back, like a football team that at half time is
being led by the other side, in order to rethink their strategy. So far, Biya
has defied them and is still standing tall.
By all accounts, the ballot box remains the most credible way
in which to bring about change. For this to happen, the opposition must unite. It
must have a single vision and act on it. There is need to refrain from
attacking Paul Biya as a person and instead focus on telling the electorate how
things will be done better if they came to power. Cameroonians in the Diaspora
must realize that so far their antagonistic method of opposition has failed. It
would be better for them to team up with the opposition and empower it so that it
gets to power.
Advocates of the
Southern Cameroons must decide what they want. But they must realize that far
from being handed on a platter of gold, power is fought for and captured. That
approach calls for sacrifice. But they must be careful not to turn sacrifice into
suicide like did the people of the self-proclaimed Republic of Biafra that
declared its independence from the Federation of Nigeria but then lost and was
forced to return and live in the status quo.
To dethrone Paul Biya is not a day`s job, neither is it a cup
of tea. Anyone who is thinking seriously of doing it must come up with a game plan
that is feasible.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire